Hi Everyone

12/14/2014

Updates.

My second book More Things You Can Do When You're Dead is now at the publishers. I am very excited about it as I have managed to get great praise for the manuscript from great minds. These are
Prominent Lawyer Victor Zammit

Quantum physicist Prof Bernard Carr
Biologist Professor John Poynton

Eminent Psychologist Stan Krippner
Pharmacist Dr David Hamilton

This book digs a little deeper that the first one and, along with poltergeist activity etc it looks at topics such as automatic writing., inspiration, genius, along with descriptions of more previously unpublished material that was investigated , mostly by myself. Already, a couple of magazines are showing signs of interest. The problem with providing evidence regarding survival is not that there is No evidence , it is just that there is so much it is really impossible to provide a whole picture, both in magnitude and content. Frustrating, but we will carry on regardless.

10 Comments

Mark Ireland link

12/14/2014 06:06:16 am

Hi Tricia, I'm really looking forward to reading your new book! If it's half as good as the first one it will be phenomenal. There are very few people doing this type of research, so your work is critically important. Equally important is your commitment to sharing the evidence in a way that the average person can understand. I applaud you for this.

Tricia

12/14/2014 06:04:45 pm

Thank you Mark. I think that we who really care are all committed to seeking the truth of these matters. I would like to think that this book surpasses the first and should make the reader really think. Automatic writing sounds boring...but it is anything but..it is just amazing.

Michael Tymn link

12/14/2014 07:37:01 am

Tricia,

I look forward to reading your new book.

You are right about there being too much evidence. The best evidence was produced 100-160 years ago and most of the more modern evidence just offers a reinvented wheel, not nearly as sturdy as the old wheels.

Tricia

12/14/2014 06:08:07 pm

I am not sure that I entirely agree with you Michael. Many of the NDE cases are made more veridical with the use of modern technology, whereby it is SHOWN that the brain has no function at all when the experiences happen.

Grahame link

12/14/2014 03:24:25 pm

When a psychic researcher makes a claim, there are usually demands for proof. When a debunker makes a claim, its usually accepted without proof. There is presenter bias on TV, like the BBC, for example, which is all the more reason for well-thought-out page turners. Thanks for the update!

Tricia

12/14/2014 06:13:05 pm

Excellent observations. A debunker says to himself 'These things cannot happen so let me find the fault in the work.' this is not science. They should actually examine the particular claim in depth before making a statement about it. Of course, if they do pick a case to study it is usually a weak one that is then held up as a straw man. Sigh! Hopefully there are no straw men in my book2

Iris

12/21/2014 12:55:35 am

I am looking forward to your new book, I really enjoyed the first!

Tricia

12/21/2014 01:41:35 am

Thank you Iris. I think that this one is even better.....but then I am biased!!! :)

Ricky Martin

12/21/2014 07:38:11 am

Looking forward to your next book and I'm sure it will be a great success

Tricia

12/21/2014 05:48:37 pm

Again, thank you Ricky. I think that you will find this one fascinating, if not mind boggling. There is a piece about irresponsible mediumship that will make your blood pressure boil.

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.

Hi Everyone

Leave a Reply.

Tricia Robertson

Archives

Categories